Check Cancellation Lawsuit Due to Loss in Turkish Law

LOSS OF A CHECK AND CHECK CANCELLATION LAWSUIT

Checks, which can also be subject to cancellation lawsuits, are a popular payment method regulated by various laws to ensure commercial security and efficiency in daily life. The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 regulates the rules regarding the payment of checks. If a check is presented within the presentation periods, is valid, and the presenter is the legitimate holder, the drawee bank is obliged to pay the check amount to that person. The negotiability of the check and its payment upon presentation pose some risks for the drawer and the legitimate holder.

A check is a cash-like payment instrument commonly used in commercial transactions. However, especially with bearer checks, there is a risk that the check may be cashed without the knowledge and consent of the legitimate holder. Additionally, a check can become unusable due to various reasons such as burning, tearing, falling into water, or losing it. Losing a check due to theft or inability to present it can lead to serious financial losses, making it essential to take necessary precautions to prevent such incidents. In such cases, the legitimate holder must take measures to protect themselves. Legal regulations are needed to guide what should be done in such situations. There are some legal ways to protect the drawer and the holder of the check, one of which is the cancellation of the check.

When it comes to valuable documents like checks, the rights and instruments they contain cannot be separated from each other. The payment of a check is only possible through presentation, and it is crucial for the right holder to keep the check in their possession. However, situations like deterioration, theft, or natural disasters that result in the loss of ownership can make it impossible to present the check. In such cases, the inability to reach the creditor can be unjust to the creditor. Therefore, the Turkish Commercial Code includes special regulations regarding the loss of checks.

The term “loss of a check” generally refers to a range of situations, including loss, theft, tearing, burning, and even wear and deterioration, encompassing cases where the check is out of the holder’s possession without their consent or cannot be used due to damage or wear.

When a check cannot be presented outside its normal course or is presented but incomprehensible and outdated, the regulations regarding the loss of the check come into play, and the cancellation of the check is arranged. There are two types of cases where the check is not presented to the drawee bank:

Absolute non-presentation (where no one can present it) and relative non-presentation (where a third person can present it for any reason) such as loss or theft.

In conclusion, the right holder’s possession of the check is essential, and the loss of the check can result from losing or stealing the check as well as from damage to the check. The Turkish Commercial Code includes special provisions on the loss of checks, encompassing a wide range of situations where the check cannot be presented.

WHAT ARE THE REMEDIES IN CASE OF LOSS OF A CHECK?

It is extremely important to protect individuals’ rights in case of loss or theft of valuable documents like checks. In such cases, there is a risk that someone else may present the check and claim the rights on it, resulting in the rightful owner’s rights being usurped. Especially checks are subject to special regulations to protect rights when lost or stolen without the holder’s consent. In case of loss or theft of a check, the legal and actual holder can apply to the competent court to prevent the presentation and collection by an illegitimate holder. As a preventive measure, obtaining a payment prohibition decision is a first step to protecting the rights of the drawer and the legitimate holder. In relative loss cases like theft or loss, a precautionary measure decision can be requested from the court. However, in cases of physical damage to the document, since the possession of the check cannot be taken back by another person, there is no need for a payment prohibition measure. It should be noted that the authority of the drawee bank to make the payment after the presentation period cannot be withdrawn once a check is issued. The non-payment of the check is only possible through revocation of the check. Therefore, in cases of relative loss, the legitimate holder must present the entire check within the presentation period. There are different legal remedies for cases where it is known or not known that the check is in someone’s possession or there is a possibility of being in someone’s possession. If the check is in another person’s possession, a lawsuit for restitution of the check can be filed, and if it is not known or impossible, a lawsuit for cancellation of the check can be filed.

In conclusion, protecting individuals’ rights in case of loss or theft of valuable documents like checks is of great importance. Various measures, including preventive measures and payment prohibition decisions, have been implemented to prevent the rightful owner’s rights from being usurped.

PROHIBITION OF PAYMENT

Protecting one’s rights in case of loss or theft of a check can be a complex and challenging process. Once a check is issued, it becomes a valuable document that must be paid by the drawee bank upon presentation. However, in case of loss or theft of the check, there is a high possibility that it may fall into the wrong hands and be used fraudulently. The law allows for the prohibition of payment, which means withdrawing the authority given to the drawee bank to make the payment upon presentation in such situations. A person who has lost possession of a check without their consent can request the prohibition of payment from the competent court in the domicile of the drawer or the holder.

In conclusion, the prohibition of payment is an important legal mechanism to protect one’s rights in case of loss or theft of a check. However, for the prohibition of payment or cancellation of the check to be applied for in court, the lost check must fully contain the mandatory elements of the check. With the assistance of legal experts, individuals can navigate this complex process and protect their interests.

RESTITUTION LAWSUIT

Checks are valuable documents that must be paid upon presentation. However, in case of loss or theft of a check, the rightful owner may need to take legal action to protect their rights. One of the legal measures they can take, as mentioned above, is the provisional payment prohibition, which involves withdrawing the authority given to the drawee bank to make the payment upon presentation.

Following the issuance of the payment prohibition, according to Turkish law, if the owner of the check is known, a restitution lawsuit can be filed within the period determined by the court. Failure to file the lawsuit within this period results in the lifting of the payment prohibition. Alternatively, the owner can request a payment prohibition as a precautionary measure and file a restitution lawsuit within the given period. If the rightful owner does not file a restitution lawsuit within the period determined by the court, the payment prohibition is lifted, and the check is returned to the presenter. It should be noted that lifting the payment prohibition without allowing the plaintiff time to file a restitution lawsuit is unlawful.

In Turkish law, the restitution of a check is a legal process that allows the holder to reclaim their rights over a lost or stolen check. However, the process of filing a restitution lawsuit is not easy and requires meeting various conditions.

One of the most important conditions for filing a restitution lawsuit is that the holder has lost possession of the check without their consent. If the check was not lost due to the holder’s negligence, they can seek legal remedies to reclaim their rights.

Another critical aspect of filing a restitution lawsuit is the need to identify the person in possession of the check. The purpose of the restitution lawsuit is to reclaim the right taken from the holder without their consent, so there must be a specific person who can be held responsible for possessing the check.

In cases where the identity of the person in possession of the check is known, the holder must prove that the check was acquired with malicious intent or gross negligence. In other words, the holder must show that the person knew the check was lost or stolen at the time of acquisition.

In conclusion, the restitution of a lost or stolen check is a legal process that requires meeting various conditions to pursue. If the holder has lost the check without their consent, the identity of the person in possession of the check is known, and the holder can prove that the check was acquired with malicious intent or gross negligence, a restitution claim can be made. The holder can reclaim their rights and prevent unauthorized use of the check by meeting these conditions. The process can become more complex in cases where the identity of the person in possession of the check is unknown. In such cases, it is crucial to seek legal advice and take appropriate measures to protect one’s rights.

CHECK CANCELLATION

Checks constitute a significant part of commercial transactions. However, in some cases, the loss or theft of checks can cause the holder to lose their rights over the check. As previously explained, a restitution lawsuit in Turkish law allows the holder to reclaim their rights over a lost or stolen check. However, if the identity of the person in possession of the check is unknown or if there is deformation on the document, the cancellation of the check may be necessary to prevent further unauthorized use or loss of rights.

CONDITIONS FOR A CHECK CANCELLATION LAWSUIT

Request for Check Cancellation

The cancellation of a valuable document like a check requires following the special procedures prescribed by the Turkish Commercial Code. Cancellation procedures can only be initiated upon request; the court cannot decide on the cancellation of a check on its initiative.

The person requesting cancellation is obliged to provide the court with convincing evidence that the check was lost while in their possession and to present a copy of the document or provide information about its essential content. It is important to note that the court will only issue a cancellation decision if the evidence

provided by the applicant strongly indicates that they are the rightful owner of the lost check.

The Right Holder Requesting Check Cancellation

The person who was the right holder on the document at the time of its loss or when the loss emerged can request the court to decide on the cancellation of the document. While the holder, the proxy holder, and the endorser can file a check cancellation lawsuit, the drawer does not have the right to file a check cancellation lawsuit.

Loss of the Check

When it comes to canceling a check through the court, one of the specific conditions that must be met is that the check has been lost due to various reasons such as theft, loss, seizure, or that the essential elements of the check have been damaged due to wear, making it impossible to present it to the drawee.

As previously explained, the non-presentation of the check can be absolute or relative. The loss of the check relates to the material aspect of the valuable paper, while the right contained in the document continues to exist and remain valid.

The Existence of a Right Attached to the Document

If the right contained in the document has not yet arisen, cannot arise after the loss, or has ceased to exist for any reason, there is no need to cancel the document. The court’s cancellation decision allows the identification of the right holder and enables the creditor to claim their right without the document, in accordance with the cancellation decision.

Inability to Obtain the Document

The primary aim of the cancellation regulation based on the loss of valuable documents is to protect the creditor’s interests. Therefore, cancellation is only made if the loss continues and the possession cannot be permanently recovered. In cases where the check is lost due to events such as burning or loss, the possession of the check is permanently lost. If the loss of the check is permanent, it is necessary to file a cancellation lawsuit to protect the creditor’s right on the check.

In summary, the cancellation regulation based on the loss of valuable documents is important for protecting the creditor’s interests. To determine whether a restitution lawsuit or a cancellation lawsuit should be filed, it is necessary to identify the circumstances leading to the loss of the check. If the loss of the check is permanent, it is necessary to file a cancellation lawsuit, and the cancellation of the check is possible regardless of whether it is subject to a lawsuit or has expired.

COMPETENT AND AUTHORIZED COURT FOR CHECK CANCELLATION LAWSUIT

As previously mentioned, the person who was the right holder on the document at the time of its loss or when the loss emerged can request the court to decide on the cancellation of the document. It has been explained that the payee, the holder, the person holding the document with an endorsement for collection, and the endorser can file a check cancellation lawsuit.

In lawsuits regarding the cancellation of checks, the court of the domicile of the payer or the holder is competent, and the commercial court of first instance is authorized. A person who has lost possession of a check without their consent can request the commercial court of first instance in the domicile of the payer or the holder to cancel the check.

CONSEQUENCES OF A CHECK CANCELLATION LAWSUIT

After determining that the subject of the transaction is a “check,” the next step for the court is to evaluate the likelihood of possession and loss based on the evidence presented in court. In cases falling under non-contentious jurisdiction, the judge is responsible for conducting the necessary investigation personally and verifying the accuracy of the plaintiff’s claims. After conducting their investigation, if the judge concludes that the plaintiff’s claims are likely to be true, they will request the person in possession of the check to present it to the court within a specified period. That is, if the court finds the explanations provided by the applicant about the loss of the check convincing, it will issue a notice inviting the person in possession of the check to present it within a specified period and warning that the check will be canceled if not presented. To ensure the check owner is informed, the court must publish at least three separate notices in the Trade Registry Gazette.

The court’s decision will depend on whether the check holder responds within the notice period. If the check is presented within this period, the court will give the plaintiff a reasonable period to file a restitution lawsuit. However, if the check holder does not appear within the notice period, the court will declare the check invalid.

In conclusion, while the negotiability and liquidity of checks make them valuable instruments in commercial transactions, they also pose certain risks. To prevent the misuse of checks and protect the rights of the drawer and the legitimate holder, it is essential to comply with legal regulations and take necessary measures.

Checks are widely used in the business world due to their ease of use. However, they can also present certain challenges such as the risk of loss, theft, or tearing. In such cases, the rights and instruments contained in the check cannot be asserted without the document. Therefore, it is important to have regulations in place that protect both the drawer and the holder in the event of loss, theft, or tearing of the check. By complying with these regulations, businesses and individuals can trust the use of checks and ensure the security of their financial transactions.

For more help or consultation on this topic, please contact us.