Evidence Rules in Turkish Criminal Procedure

Evidence forms the foundation of criminal prosecutions and defenses in Turkey. Turkish Criminal Procedure Code establishes comprehensive rules governing what evidence courts can consider, how it must be obtained, and standards for evaluation. Understanding these rules helps defendants protect their rights and attorneys build effective defense strategies.

Types of Admissible Evidence

Documentary evidence includes written materials, electronic records, photographs, and video recordings. Contracts, financial records, correspondence, and official documents frequently appear in criminal cases. Authenticity must be established before courts rely on documents.

Physical evidence encompasses tangible items connected to alleged offenses. Weapons, stolen property, drugs, and forensic samples require proper chain of custody documentation. Defense attorneys challenge evidence when handling procedures create contamination or alteration risks.

Testimonial evidence comes from witnesses with direct knowledge of relevant facts. Both prosecution and defense can call witnesses. Expert testimony addresses technical matters beyond lay understanding, including medical opinions, forensic analysis, and financial evaluations.

Burden of Proof

Prosecutors bear the burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Defendants need not prove innocence. This fundamental principle protects accused individuals from wrongful conviction based on insufficient evidence.

Presumption of innocence requires courts to resolve doubts in favor of defendants. When evidence permits multiple reasonable interpretations, the version favoring the accused must prevail. Prosecutors cannot rely on speculation or possibility.

Illegal Evidence Exclusion

Evidence obtained through rights violations faces exclusion from proceedings. Unlawful searches without proper warrants or legal justification render discovered evidence inadmissible. This exclusionary rule protects constitutional rights against unreasonable searches.

Statements obtained through coercion, torture, threats, or deception cannot be used. Confessions made without being informed of rights or without attorney presence when requested are typically excluded.

Violations of attorney-client privilege make intercepted communications inadmissible. Confidential consultations between defendants and lawyers receive absolute protection.

Search and Seizure Requirements

Police need warrants for most searches of homes and private property. Warrant applications must demonstrate probable cause that evidence of specific crimes exists at the location. Judges review applications before authorizing searches.

Exceptions permit warrantless searches in emergencies, when evidence faces imminent destruction, during hot pursuit of suspects, or with valid consent. These exceptions have narrow boundaries that defense counsel can challenge.

Seized items must be properly documented, photographed, and stored. Chain of custody records track evidence handling from seizure through trial presentation. Gaps in documentation raise questions about evidence integrity.

Electronic Evidence

Digital evidence requires specialized handling. Computer files, emails, social media posts, and phone records face authentication requirements. Metadata analysis can establish when documents were created or modified.

Prosecutors must demonstrate that digital evidence was not altered after collection. Forensic imaging of devices preserves original data while allowing examination. Defense experts can challenge collection methods or authenticity.

Expert Witnesses and Reports

Courts frequently appoint expert witnesses to address technical questions. Medical examiners, forensic scientists, accountants, and other specialists provide objective analysis. Expert reports must explain methodology and reasoning.

Defense attorneys can challenge expert qualifications, methodology, or conclusions. Requesting independent expert examination provides alternative perspectives. Cross-examination exposes weaknesses in expert opinions.

Witness Testimony Rules

Witnesses testify under oath with penalties for perjury. Cross-examination rights allow both sides to question witnesses and challenge credibility. Leading questions are generally prohibited during direct examination.

Hearsay evidence faces restrictions. Witnesses must testify about their personal knowledge rather than repeating what others told them. Exceptions exist for statements made by unavailable witnesses or spontaneous utterances during events.

Victim Statements

Victim testimony receives careful evaluation. Courts recognize that victims have interests in case outcomes that might affect objectivity. Corroborating evidence strengthens victim accounts while uncorroborated claims face scrutiny.

Inconsistencies between initial complaints and trial testimony create credibility issues. Defense counsel highlights contradictions to cast doubt on prosecution narratives.

Character Evidence

Turkish law limits character evidence use. Past criminal convictions can affect credibility assessments but cannot alone prove guilt in current charges. Prior bad acts are generally inadmissible to show criminal propensity.

Good character evidence supporting defendant credibility has limited scope. Courts focus on evidence related to charged offenses rather than general character assessments.

Circumstantial Evidence

Indirect evidence proving facts through inference is permissible when it logically supports conclusions. Circumstantial cases require chains of evidence eliminating reasonable alternative explanations.

Defense strategies attack weak links in circumstantial chains. Showing that evidence supports multiple interpretations creates reasonable doubt.

Documentary Authentication

Documents must be authenticated before admission. Official documents carry presumptions of authenticity while private documents require verification. Forensic document examination can detect forgeries or alterations.

Electronic signatures and digital documents follow specific authentication procedures. Technology standards continue evolving as digital evidence becomes more prevalent.

Judicial Notice

Courts can take judicial notice of commonly known facts without requiring proof. Geographic facts, historical events, and scientific principles accepted in relevant fields need not be proven through evidence.

Evidence Evaluation Standards

Judges evaluate evidence freely without rigid formulas. They assess credibility, weight evidence, and draw reasonable inferences. Written decisions must explain how evidence supported conclusions.

Appellate courts review whether evidence reasonably supports verdicts but defer to trial judges on witness credibility and weight assessments.

 

---

Work With Experienced Legal Counsel

Soylu Law thoroughly analyzes evidence in criminal cases to identify admissibility issues and challenge prosecution materials.

Our firm works with forensic experts to examine physical and digital evidence. We file suppression motions when evidence was obtained illegally and challenge unreliable expert testimony.

We assist international clients in managing evidence that originates from foreign jurisdictions. Our team coordinates authentication of overseas documents and handles translation requirements for evidence in multiple languages.

 

For more assistance or consultation on this matter, you can contact us.