The Lawsuit for Right of Way in Turkish Law

RIGHT OF WAY LAWSUIT

Disputes over property ownership and access to public roads can lead to conflicts among property owners. To resolve this issue, the law obliges property owners to provide access for neighboring right holders who lack sufficient access to public roads. This legal right is known as the right of way. It can be established by paying full compensation to the neighbor granting the right of way. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the right of way lawsuit and the scope and establishment of the right of way concept.

The right of way allows a property owner to access a public road even if they do not have direct access. This provision is particularly important for property owners in areas with limited infrastructure or remote locations. It emphasizes that if a property does not have direct access to a public road, the owner has the right to establish a right of way over neighboring properties for a fee. This means the property owner can negotiate a passage easement with neighboring property owners and register a contract in the land registry or claim the right through a right of way lawsuit.

RIGHT OF WAY

According to legal order, every property owner has the authority to use, benefit from, and dispose of their property as they wish. This property right covers a wide range of assets, including immovable properties. However, this authority is not unlimited, and Turkish law imposes certain restrictions on property rights. These restrictions may arise from contracts or laws and can be related to private or public law.

One of the most notable restrictions on immovable properties relates to the rights of neighboring persons. This restriction is addressed through the right of way, a legal limitation arising from relationships between neighbors. The right of way is not automatically established and requires a request from the person seeking access. This request obliges the property owner to establish a real right for the benefit of the person needing access to the neighboring property in exchange for payment.

The right of way, which grants access to a part of a neighboring property in return for compensation, is a significant legal provision. Without this provision, property owners needing access might face difficulties in negotiating with neighbors, leading to high fees or even denial of access. This situation can have serious consequences, especially for properties in remote areas or those requiring regular access by vehicles or machinery.

The right of way pertains to the establishment of a passage right for property owners whose properties lack connection to public roads or have insufficient access roads. The property owner needing access can establish a passage easement over neighboring properties by paying the full price. The law grants property owners the right to demand the establishment of a passage easement and ensures their involvement in determining the content and scope of the easement and the necessary compensation fee.

Fundamentally, the right of way serves as a critical legal mechanism addressing a common problem faced by real estate owners. It represents a limited real right that can be established by contract and must be registered in the land registry. Its purpose is to balance the interests of the neighboring property owner and those of the owners in need, while also ensuring that the property owner has a say in determining the easement right and the compensation fee.

The right of way exemplifies the importance of property law in protecting the rights and interests of property owners and ensuring the fair and equitable regulation of property use. By offering property owners in need the ability to negotiate a transit easement over a neighboring property for compensation, it helps resolve disputes that would otherwise be difficult to settle. Therefore, it plays a critical role in mitigating the adverse impacts on the rights and access to essential resources of property owners in areas with limited infrastructure or remote property locations.

CONDITIONS FOR ESTABLISHING A RIGHT OF WAY

Establishing a right of way requires adhering strictly to specific conditions in a legally complex process. These conditions generally fall into two categories: general legal conditions and specific conditions related to the concrete case.

Ultimately, it is crucial to carefully consider and fulfill all necessary conditions before initiating the process of establishing a right of way. Failure to meet any of these requirements may result in the court rejecting the request. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that all legal and practical requirements are met before applying for a right of way. Generally, before requesting the establishment of a right of way, it is mandatory to carefully assess all the necessary conditions. Failure to meet any of these conditions may prevent the court from accepting the request. Hence, it is very important to ensure that all legal and practical requirements are met before applying.

1. GENERAL CONDITIONS

– The Property Subject to the Right of Way Must Be Registered in the Land Registry.

The establishment of the right of way is a legal matter subject to various factual and legal conditions. One of the main conditions necessary for the existence of this right is that the properties subject to the right must be registered. Essentially, a right of way cannot be established for properties not registered in the land registry.

– The Necessity of the Right of Way Must Be Compulsory.

The right of way is a legal concept that grants the right to use a part of another’s land for access to a road or main road. The necessity of access varies depending on certain conditions and can be absolute or relative. The absolute necessity for passage arises when a property has no connection to a public road, either completely or partially.

In cases of absolute necessity, the right of way is granted unconditionally due to the lack of any alternative route to a public road. However, in cases of relative necessity, the granting of the right of way depends on an objective assessment of factors such as the nature of the property, its intended use, economic burdens, and the extent of the necessity. The judge responsible for determining the proportionality will make a decision based on the circumstances and details of each case.

In determining the necessity for passage, it is crucial to adhere to the principle of equity for the property granting the right of way. This principle states that the granting of the right of way should not impose an unreasonable burden on the property owner granting the right. Instead, the burden should be shared fairly and justly.

In conclusion, it is a complex legal issue that requires careful consideration of the unique circumstances of each case. While absolute necessity for passage is accepted unconditionally, the granting of the right of way for relative necessity is subject to assessment criteria and the principle of balancing sacrifices.

– Full Compensation Must Be Paid.

Establishing the right of way is a legal intervention that limits the property owner’s right of disposition over the property. This right can only be granted under certain conditions, one of which is ensuring compensation for the sacrifice made by the property owner granting the right of way. This compensation, known as the full price, is determined by the court if there is no agreement between the parties. It is designed not to compensate for damages but to balance the sacrifices made.

The determination of the full price depends on various factors such as the nature of the real estate, the value of the area allocated for the road, the loss of value of the property due to the passage, and the decrease in income from the property at the location of the road.

In conclusion, the full price is a crucial component in establishing the right of way. It represents a fair balance of the sacrifices made by both the property owner granting the right and the party requesting the right of way. Therefore, determining the full price should be based on careful consideration of various technical factors and with the assistance of expert opinions to achieve a fair and equitable result.

2. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

Establishing the right of way involves several specific conditions that must be met to ensure fairness and equity for all parties involved in this complex legal matter.

– The Condition of Considering Previous Conditions and Existing Roads of the Properties Must Be Met.

Among these conditions, one of the most important is the necessity of considering the previous conditions and existing roads of the property. Practically, this means that when requesting the right of way, the previous conditions of the property must be taken into account and evaluated. In particular, when the property subject to the right of way is divided or subdivided, it is necessary to determine which parcel will be used on the general road based on the pre-division state. Additionally, if the location of the general road has changed, the passage must be requested from the parcel that benefits the most from the opening of the new road.

– The Passage Must Be Established in a Way That Causes the Least Damage.

One of the critical conditions for establishing a mandatory right of way is the concept of least damage. This principle means that if a property owner needs to cross another’s land to access a general road, the path that causes the least harm must be chosen.

Courts must consider various factors to determine the least damaging route, such as the economic and geometric integrity of the burdened property, the inaccessibility of the route, and the nature of any agricultural or industrial activities on the land. In cases where general roads around the property are not connected, the place where the right of way can be established with the shortest and least cost will be preferred.

– Balancing the Interests of the Parties Must Be Ensured.

Establishing the right of way involves a multifaceted commitment that requires careful consideration of the interests of all stakeholders. Several conditions must be met to create a mandatory right of way. The size of the passage must be proportional to the needs of the affected parties and not excessive. Additionally, the price to be paid for the easement must be determined fairly, considering the legitimate needs of the affected property owner. All alternative passages determined in the specific case should be compared, and the views of the title holders of the relevant properties should be considered.

Overall, establishing a mandatory right

of way is a highly complex and nuanced process that requires careful consideration of the interests of all parties involved. Fundamental factors such as the size of the passage, the price to be paid, and the impact on neighboring properties must be considered to reach a fair and balanced decision. By following these guidelines, it is possible to create a mandatory right of way that meets the needs of all parties involved while minimizing any negative impact on neighboring properties.

HOW TO ESTABLISH A RIGHT OF WAY?

Easements play a critical role in property law by regulating the use and enjoyment of real estate. These rights are essential for the smooth functioning of society as they ensure individuals have unobstructed access to their properties. Today, easement rights function as a means to provide access to properties and prevent disputes among neighboring property owners.

One of the most common types of easement is the right of way. This type of easement allows a person to cross another’s property to access their own. For example, if a property is landlocked and has no direct path to a public road, the owner may need to establish a right of way over the neighbor’s property to access the road.

Establishing an easement requires the cooperation of both the property owner and the person seeking the right. In some cases, an easement can be established through a contract between the two parties. If both parties agree on the terms of the easement, this can be a straightforward process; however, if the property owner does not want to grant an easement, the person seeking the right may need to resort to legal action to establish their access right.

Establishing a right of way, also known as an easement, is a significant mechanism that allows a person or entity to cross another’s property. As explained earlier, a mandatory passage easement can be established through court decisions, while passage easements based on the property owner’s consent can be established by contract between the relevant parties.

ESTABLISHING A RIGHT OF WAY BY CONTRACT

When establishing an easement, the property owner in need of passage will initially direct their request to the neighboring property owner. If the neighboring property owner agrees to establish the right of way, a contract for establishing the right of way must be drawn up. Since the right of way will be registered in the land registry, the principle of the causality of registration must be observed, and the contract for establishing the right of way must meet the following conditions to avoid any loss of rights:

– The validity of the contract for establishing the right of way depends on its formal arrangement.

– The parties to the right of way contract must have the authority to dispose and represent. If the property owner needing the right of way is also the owner of the neighboring property, they can establish the right of way by submitting a written request to the land registry office and registering the right upon this request.

– The right of way contract is a bilateral contract obliging the property owner to establish the right to request registration and the property owner to pay the agreed amount.

– The contract must explicitly state the matters relating to the properties, the nature of the passage, and the price.

In conclusion, the right of way is a legal mechanism that allows the owner of a property in need to establish a right of passage over another person’s property. While the conditions for using the right of way are defined in Turkish law, disputes may arise over determining the compensation amount or fulfilling legal requirements. In such cases, legal avenues will be pursued to establish the right of way, including applying to the court for a mandatory registration decision or forcing the property owner to enter into an easement agreement.

ESTABLISHMENT BY LAWSUIT – RIGHT OF WAY LAWSUIT

Disputes may arise over determining the compensation amount or fulfilling the legal requirements for establishing the right of way. The implementation of the right of way is only possible through a right of way agreement between the owner of the property in need and the owner of the property without access to the public road. However, if the owner of the burdened property refuses to accept the registration, the owner of the property in need can file a lawsuit for mandatory registration. In such cases, the owner of the property in need can apply to the court for a mandatory registration decision or force the owner of the burdened property to enter into an easement agreement. The court’s decision will replace both the declaration of intent of the owner of the burdened property and the fundamental legal transaction constituting the debt. Before the court decides on mandatory registration, it will ensure the payment of the amount determined for the right of way.

In summary, the right of way is a legal provision that allows a property owner to request a suitable passage from neighbors for full compensation and register the properties subject to the passage. The debt relationship arising from the exercise of the right includes the declaration of intent of the owner of the burdened property to recognize the right and the payment of the appropriate amount by the owner of the property to be granted the right. If the parties cannot agree on matters related to the passage, the owner of the property in need can apply to the court to establish the right and file a right of way lawsuit.

PARTIES TO THE RIGHT OF WAY LAWSUIT

The plaintiff in the right of way lawsuit must be the owner of the property in favor of which the right of way will be established. This owner can be a natural or legal person. In the case of joint ownership, it is possible for one or more beneficiaries to file a lawsuit on behalf of all beneficiaries for the common benefit. In the case of co-ownership, all owners of the property must participate in the lawsuit. If the property is acquired through inheritance, co-ownership will also be in question, and all heirs must file the lawsuit together.

In the right of way lawsuit, the defendant is the owner of the property against which the right of way will be established. If the property is in joint or co-ownership, all owners must participate in the lawsuit. If the ownership of the property changes during the lawsuit, the plaintiff must include the new owner in the lawsuit.

COMPETENT AND JURISDICTIONAL COURT IN THE RIGHT OF WAY LAWSUIT

The competent court in the right of way lawsuit is the civil court of first instance. When determining the jurisdiction of the court, it is important to note that in disputes related to immovable properties, the court where the property is located has exclusive jurisdiction. Thus, the court where the property in question is located will have jurisdiction in the right of way lawsuit.

In conclusion, understanding the jurisdiction of courts in lawsuits related to mandatory right of way and easement rights is of great importance for ensuring legal compliance and effectively resolving disputes. It is essential for parties involved in such disputes to know the appropriate jurisdictional court and take the necessary legal actions accordingly.

For more help or consultation on this topic, please contact us.